{"id":241,"date":"2026-07-03T09:08:03","date_gmt":"2026-07-03T09:08:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241"},"modified":"2026-07-03T09:08:03","modified_gmt":"2026-07-03T09:08:03","slug":"the-supreme-courts-latest-blow-to-trans-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court\u2019s Latest Blow to Trans Rights"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The Supreme Court has delivered another blow to LGBTQ rights, upholding legislation that bars trans girls and women from participating in women\u2019s sports. The Court\u2019s 6\u20133 decision in (consolidated with Little v. Hecox<\/em>) addressed laws in West Virginia and Idaho but, in effect, affirmed 27 state-level bans on trans women\u2019s participation in women\u2019s sports.<\/p>\n

Read more Our National Parks Deserve Better Than Trump<\/a><\/p>\n

Although \u2014the nation\u2019s first ban on transgender athletes\u2014and West Virginia\u2019s Save Women\u2019s Sports Act<\/em> (2021) both bar transgender student athletes from participating on teams that match their gender identity.<\/p>\n

The cases raised different legal questions.<\/p>\n

In B.P.J.,<\/em> the Court considers how Title IX should be interpreted in relation to West Virginia\u2019s legislation, particularly as it applies to Becky Pepper-Jackson, a 16-year-old transgender female player who, in 2021, was barred from running for her middle school\u2019s track team, and other athletes like her, who were assigned male at birth but, because they received puberty-delaying treatment, did not undergo male puberty.<\/p>\n

Hecox<\/em>, by contrast, focused on the bans\u2019 implications under the Equal Protection Clause.<\/p>\n

The Court ruled that neither Title IX of the Civil Rights Act nor the Constitution\u2019s Equal Protection Clause prevents states from barring transgender female athletes from participating in women\u2019s sports. The Court argued that, by linking participation in women\u2019s (and men\u2019s) sports to an athlete\u2019s \u201cbiological sex,\u201d states were acting consistently with Title IX\u2019s 1974 Javits Amendment, which Senator Jacob Javits offered to the 1972 law that opened the door for women\u2019s sports. The amendment from the late New York Republican permits schools to maintain sex-segregated athletic teams to promote equal opportunities for female participation in school athletics.<\/p>\n

The Court similarly argued that even under heightened scrutiny\u2014a standard used to review sex-based classifications under the Constitution\u2019s Equal Protection Clause\u2014legislation that bars transgender athletes from playing for teams that match their gender identity passes constitutional muster. Such laws, the Court held, are simply protecting female athletic participation.<\/p>\n

Testosterone and Male Athletic Advantage<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Any number of legal and scientific fallacies or assumptions may lurk behind the Court\u2019s reasoning\u2014and trans athlete bans more broadly. The most common argument used to bar transgender women\u2019s participation in women\u2019s sports\u2014despite the rarity of transgender athletes\u2014centers on testosterone and its role in building muscle mass, height, strength, and speed. Advocates of athletic bans argue that the physiological changes associated with higher testosterone levels give athletes who were deemed male at birth a competitive advantage over most female athletes. Banning trans female athletes, advocates argue, protects cisgender female athletic competitiveness.<\/p>\n

B.P.J.<\/em> and Hecox <\/em>offered compelling counterfactual evidence. Neither B.P.J nor Hecox exhibits testosterone-induced advantages over cisgender female athletes. After approximately one year of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), Lindsay Hecox experienced a noticeable decline in her athletic performance, and her race times reflected that change. She did not qualify for Boise State University\u2019s women\u2019s track team in 2020.<\/p>\n

Becky Pepper-Jackson (B.P.J.) never developed the physiological markers or athletic benefits of male puberty. She started puberty-delaying therapies when she was in middle school and underwent hormone replacement therapy in 2022. Her body did not experience the physiological changes of male puberty that allow most cisgender male athletes to outcompete female athletes.\u00a0<\/p>\n

In ways relevant to athletic competitiveness, then, Becky is physiologically indistinguishable from athletes assigned female at birth. As her attorney stated during oral arguments, \u201cby virtue of her medical care, B.P.J. has already effectively controlled for those sex-based advantages, and so she is completely in the position that she would have been if her birth-assigned sex had been female.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

This is why B.P.J. deployed a narrower approach regarding her legal rights. She did not contend that Title IX prohibits sex-separated sports. Rather, she argued that West Virginia\u2019s law unlawfully denied transgender girls like herself, who had not experienced male puberty, their opportunity to play sports.<\/p>\n

The Court Sidesteps Science<\/strong><\/h3>\n

However, the majority ignores science altogether by focusing on the Javits Amendment\u2019s promotion of women\u2019s equality through sex-segregated student sports. For the Court, Idaho\u2019s and West Virginia\u2019s laws merely account for the \u201cinherent physical differences between biological men and biological women as well as the safety and competitive fairness concerns that would arise if males were allowed to compete in female sports.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Court argues that the bans do not rely on gender classifications. Rather, trans female athletes are one subset of all birth-assigned-male athletes who are barred from women\u2019s sports.\u00a0<\/p>\n

To illustrate, Kavanaugh offers a : \u201cif a school had a co-ed sports team but prohibited all transgender individuals from participating on the team, that would be a distinct transgender classification and, unlike today\u2019s cases, would presumably not be analyzed and justified as a classification based on biological sex.\u201d The Court held that in West Virginia\u2019s and Idaho\u2019s legislation, all<\/em> identified male-at-birth athletes are barred from participating in women\u2019s sports, which, under Title IX, is an allowable exclusion.<\/p>\n

Read more The Washington Monthly Was Right About Egg Prices<\/a><\/p>\n

The Court scaffolds its arguments. First, in response to B.P.J.\u2019s argument that West Virginia illegally prohibits her right to play sports, the Court says that legislatures are under no obligation to \u201cconduct an individual-by-individual comparison of the physical and athletic capabilities of all biological males.\u201d They argue that \u201cthe State is not constitutionally <\/em>required\u201d nor mandated by Title IX \u201cto grant individualized exemptions to specific athletes or subclasses.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Second, it limits the relevance of the Court\u2019s pivotal Bostock <\/em>decision in 2020, which held that gender identity discrimination is a form of sex-based discrimination in employment that is outlawed under Title VII\u2014federal legislation that bars employment-based discrimination based on race, sex, religion, and other protected classifications.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Writing for the Bostock<\/em> Court in 2020, Justice Neil Gorsuch argued: \u201cIt is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex.\u201d He explains, \u201ctake an employer who fires a transgender person who was identified as a male at birth but who now identifies as a female. If the employer retains an otherwise identical employee who was identified as female at birth, the employer intentionally penalizes a person identified as male at birth for traits or actions that it tolerates in an employee identified as female at birth.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

The B.P.J. <\/em>majority, which includes Gorsuch, distinguishes the facts of Bostock<\/em> from those presented in B.P.J<\/em>. It argues that Title IX and Title VII differ in ways that quarantine Bostock<\/em>\u2019s logic. The main difference is that, unlike Title VII, Title IX\u2019s sports-related regulations allow<\/em> or encourage sex-based segregation. If Title IX promotes sex-based segregation in sports, then, argues the Court, it follows that anyone deemed male at birth, regardless of their gender identity or years of intensive treatments to limit their puberty and testosterone, can be prohibited from playing women\u2019s sports.<\/p>\n

Third, the Court reaffirmed its logic from Skrmetti,<\/em> its 2025 decision upholding bans on gender-affirming care for minors, arguing that judges are ill-prepared to weigh competing scientific claims. Instead, as Kavanaugh states, \u201c[t]he legislatures and the schools are better equipped\u2014and under the Constitution, are the more appropriate entities\u2014to assess the competing medical and scientific considerations and draw appropriate lines.\u201dThis logic may have a certain appeal to some\u2014particularly those who bristle when courts intervene in contentious policy debates. But defaulting to legislatures in matters of scientific conflict also denies trans female athletes their rights to seek justice as assuredly as it would victims of Title VII discrimination.<\/p>\n

The Court\u2019s opinion does not hint at what this ruling may unleash. The decision\u2014and its interpretation of Title IX\u2014will likely bolster federal efforts to compel states to adopt these policies in exchange for federal funding. Only time will tell how vigorously Donald Trump administration might seek to end transgender participation in sports\u2014particularly against states such as California, Oregon, or Maine, whose officials have been vocal adversaries of Trump\u2019s anti-trans policies.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Supreme Court validation may speed implementation of the existing 27 bans and the attendant questions of whether and how female athletes must prove their sex. Existing examples in other aspects of daily life are not comforting. Anti-trans policies regarding bathrooms highlight the harms all women, not just trans ones, face under a regime where females may be called upon to prove their sex. In some states, individuals have been inspired to question or even attack any individual they believe is wrongly using the women\u2019s restroom. Even without restroom vigilantes, the laws themselves have penalties, and a display of one\u2019s genitals could be part of any arrest or legal proceeding.\u00a0<\/p>\n

A Note on Tone<\/strong><\/h3>\n

The Court has not been shy about throwing its support behind anti-trans efforts. Despite Bostock<\/em>\u2019s 2020 ban on trans discrimination in employment under the Civil Rights Act, the Court has supported challenges to gender affirming care, revived conversion therapy, barred gender affirming practices and policies in schools, and now upheld bans outlawing trans women\u2019s participation in women\u2019s sports. Beyond the ruling in these trans-athlete cases, the tone employed by the Court speaks volumes about its willingness to disregard trans identities casually.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Kavanaugh consistently refers to B.P.J., Hecox and other trans female athletes as \u201cbiological males\u201d who identify as female\u2014and sometimes \u201cboys who identify as girls.\u201d These terms betray the majority\u2019s ideological leanings and its ignorance. \u201cBiological male\u201d is widely perceived as a trivializing term that ignores the experiences of transgender individuals and their attempts to rectify incongruities between their birth-assigned sex and their gender identity. \u201cBiological males\u201d negates the importance of gender identity as a way of organizing one\u2019s sense of self. For B.P.J., Hecox, and other transgender individuals taking hormone treatments for gender dysphoria, it ignores the biological sex-based changes they are experiencing. It ignores biology, period.<\/p>\n

Then there\u2019s Kavanaugh\u2019s coda, where transgender female athletes are depriving cisgender female athletes of their place on the team. \u201cEvery athlete who makes a team,\u201d Kavanaugh writes, \u201ctakes a roster spot from another athlete. Every player who earns playing time reduces the playing time of a teammate. Every player who makes the starting lineup sidelines another who remains on the bench.\u201d He continues: \u201cWomen and girls who play sports spend extraordinary time and effort to train in the heat and in the cold, to work out early in the morning and late at night, to get a little faster, to become a little stronger, to jump a little higher, to shoot a little better.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

To the transgender athletes who can be and often are excluded from sports, he writes, \u201cWe recognize that student-athletes are understandably disappointed and upset when they do not make a team or otherwise cannot participate. But the Title IX regulations \u2026 cannot and do not guarantee every student a spot on a team\u2019s roster.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Kavanaugh, a coach to his daughter\u2019s basketball teams, who has spoken lovingly about their experiences as athletes, excludes B.P.J., Hecox and all transgender female athletes from the \u201cwomen and girls,\u201d including his own, whom he has lauded. By extension, he diminishes parents like himself who wish to coach their daughters\u2019 teams. He elides, if not callously disregards, B.P.J.\u2019s and Hecox\u2019s \u201ctime and effort to train\u201d and their insatiable commitment to sports, which carried the additional burden of legal and public backlash. These student-athletes deserve better.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Read more The Fight in the Democratic Party Is Not Left vs. Center, But Left vs. Left<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

SCOTUS upheld bans on transgender athletes in women\u2019s sports, sidestepping evidence and narrowing its own logic on trans discrimination.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":240,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,5,2,3],"tags":[97],"class_list":["post-241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-law-and-justice","category-podcast","category-politics","category-the-monopolized-economy","tag-tagged-brett-kavanaugh-civil-rights-equal-protection-gender-affirming-care-lgbtq-rights-neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-title-ix-trans-rights-women"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Supreme Court\u2019s Latest Blow to Trans Rights - USA Business Chronicle<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Supreme Court\u2019s Latest Blow to Trans Rights - USA Business Chronicle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"SCOTUS upheld bans on transgender athletes in women\u2019s sports, sidestepping evidence and narrowing its own logic on trans discrimination.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"USA Business Chronicle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-03T09:08:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366\"},\"headline\":\"The Supreme Court\u2019s Latest Blow to Trans Rights\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-03T09:08:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241\"},\"wordCount\":1953,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/4cb4cb81bc415ec664155ccc5632f447.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Tagged: Brett Kavanaugh,\u00a0civil rights,\u00a0Equal Protection,\u00a0gender-affirming care,\u00a0LGBTQ rights,\u00a0Neil Gorsuch,\u00a0Supreme Court,\u00a0Title IX,\u00a0trans rights,\u00a0Women\u2019s Sports\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Law and Justice\",\"Podcast\",\"Politics\",\"The Monopolized Economy\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241\",\"name\":\"The Supreme Court\u2019s Latest Blow to Trans Rights - USA Business Chronicle\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/4cb4cb81bc415ec664155ccc5632f447.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-03T09:08:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/4cb4cb81bc415ec664155ccc5632f447.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/4cb4cb81bc415ec664155ccc5632f447.webp\",\"width\":2287,\"height\":1818},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=241#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Supreme Court\u2019s Latest Blow to Trans Rights\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"USA Business Chronicle\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Supreme Court\u2019s Latest Blow to Trans Rights - USA Business Chronicle","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Supreme Court\u2019s Latest Blow to Trans Rights - USA Business Chronicle","og_description":"SCOTUS upheld bans on transgender athletes in women\u2019s sports, sidestepping evidence and narrowing its own logic on trans discrimination.","og_url":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241","og_site_name":"USA Business Chronicle","article_published_time":"2026-07-03T09:08:03+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366"},"headline":"The Supreme Court\u2019s Latest Blow to Trans Rights","datePublished":"2026-07-03T09:08:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241"},"wordCount":1953,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4cb4cb81bc415ec664155ccc5632f447.webp","keywords":["Tagged: Brett Kavanaugh,\u00a0civil rights,\u00a0Equal Protection,\u00a0gender-affirming care,\u00a0LGBTQ rights,\u00a0Neil Gorsuch,\u00a0Supreme Court,\u00a0Title IX,\u00a0trans rights,\u00a0Women\u2019s Sports"],"articleSection":["Law and Justice","Podcast","Politics","The Monopolized Economy"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241","url":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241","name":"The Supreme Court\u2019s Latest Blow to Trans Rights - USA Business Chronicle","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4cb4cb81bc415ec664155ccc5632f447.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-03T09:08:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4cb4cb81bc415ec664155ccc5632f447.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/4cb4cb81bc415ec664155ccc5632f447.webp","width":2287,"height":1818},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=241#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Supreme Court\u2019s Latest Blow to Trans Rights"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/","name":"USA Business Chronicle","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com"],"url":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=241"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/240"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}