{"id":165,"date":"2026-06-10T09:12:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-10T09:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165"},"modified":"2026-06-10T09:12:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-10T09:12:00","slug":"the-roberts-courts-gutting-of-the-voting-rights-act-nears-completion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165","title":{"rendered":"The Roberts Court\u2019s Gutting of the Voting Rights Act Nears Completion"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>The six Republican-nominated Justices who dominate the Supreme Court have found an ingenious way to commemorate the 250<sup>th<\/sup> anniversary of American independence. Their April ruling in <em>Louisiana v. Callais<\/em>, and their June ruling in <em>Allen v. Milligan, <\/em>accepting the elimination of one of the two Alabama congressional seats where African Americans could prevail, have effectively eviscerated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA). That act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (CRA) are indisputably the two most important constitutional statutes Congress has ever adopted. Both passed with super-majorities, opposed primarily by Southern Democrats fighting a lost-cause campaign to preserve the monstrous edifice of racial segregation. The VRA is the more important of the two acts. It has been revised several times since 1965, through processes involving close deliberation and bipartisan cooperation. The last major revisions of the VRA that President George W. Bush signed in 2006 passed the House, 390-33, and the Senate, 98-0.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=163\">The Defeat of Spencer Pratt Is a Defeat of AI Slop<\/a><\/p>\n<p>If there has been a long arc of justice in American history, these two landmark acts mark its apogee, forming the legal framework for the Second Reconstruction. From the vantage point of the bicentennials of 1976 (the Declaration of Independence) and 1987 (the Constitution), the effective implementation of these statutes led many Americans to believe that the most disturbing legacies of our national history had been overcome.<\/p>\n<p>That feeling was not shared by Chief Justice John Roberts, however. He expressed his well-documented animus toward the VRA early in his career, while serving in Ronald Reagan\u2019s Department of Justice. The Chief Justice knows how to play the \u201clong game\u201d of judicial strategy, and this campaign has been the longest game of all, with the Court repeatedly signaling with a judicial wink and nod how the VRA could be diminished and finally gutted.<\/p>\n<p>Other writers, notably Rick Hasen and Richard Pildes, have better explained the nuances of this judicial campaign. But at this moment, when citizens should be reflecting on the constitutional ideas and aspirations of the Founding generation, a working historian who spends his waking hours in the 18<sup>th<\/sup> century, as I do, can contribute to a critique of the wretched flaws in <em>Louisiana v. Callais <\/em>and its derivative sequel in <em>Allen v. Milligan<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>From such a vantage point, the rationale that Justice Samuel Alito applied in the majority opinion in <em>Callais<\/em> can be faulted on two historical grounds. One involves how the revolutionary generation conceived of the essential defining characteristic of a representative assembly. The second reflected the disparaging views of the state legislatures that dominated the thinking of Framers of the Constitution\u2014most notably James Madison\u2014in 1787.<\/p>\n<p>It was commonplace in 1776 to view the lower house of a popularly elected legislature as a \u201cmirror,\u201d \u201cminiature,\u201d \u201cportrait,\u201d or \u201ctranscript\u201d of society. John Adams stated the point in his pamphlet, <em>Thoughts on Government<\/em>, which had as profound an effect on the debate over the adoption of new constitutions of government as Thomas Paine\u2019s <em>Common Sense<\/em> had on the compelling rationale for declaring independence.<\/p>\n<p>A \u201crepresentative assembly,\u201d Adams wrote,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em>should be in miniature, an exact portrait of the people at large. It should think, feel, reason, and act like them. That it may be the interest of this Assembly to do strict justice at all times, it should be an equal representation, or in other words, equal interest among the people should have equal interest in it. Great care should be taken to effect this.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The complementary objective, Adams concluded, was \u201cto prevent unfair, partial, and corrupt elections.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The underlying idea was that just a plan of representation would literally re-present the larger society within the government. Of course, the question of who would fit within that miniature or mirror remained open. Notions of political inclusion in 1776 and 1787 were far narrower than ours, and we remain conscious of that gap. But the ideal of what a representative assembly should be still holds. More important, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, along with its subsequent amendments, marked a fulfillment of that revolutionary ideal\u2014an achievement we should be venerating, not interring, in our 250<sup>th<\/sup> anniversary moment.<\/p>\n<p>For a long time, I wondered whether Adams was the innovator who first stated this ideal. But thanks to Eric Nelson of Harvard, I learned that the concept of representation by mirroring originated in the 1640s, amid the controversies between the House of Commons and the Stuart monarchy that led to the English Civil War and the execution of Charles I in 1649. Its main proponent was Henry Parker, a leading polemicist, who defended the claims of the House of Commons against the king\u2019s authoritarian tendencies. The more closely the House of Commons resembled its electors, the stronger its claim that just rule required the consent of the governed.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=161\">Trump Escalates War on Science<\/a><\/p>\n<p>No leap of imagination is needed to conclude that eliminating majority-minority congressional districts designed to ensure the election of candidates favored by African American voters violates this principle. Nor is it surprising that some Republican-controlled legislatures explicitly identified the African American representatives they intend to purge. The same could be said about the surgical decomposition of particular congressional districts. Take Tennessee\u2019s ninth district, which represented the predominantly African-American city of Memphis. Its population has now been dispersed into impotent minorities across three surrounding districts.<\/p>\n<p>The immediacy of these reactions demonstrates the absurdity of the underlying presupposition of <em>Callais<\/em>: that racial attitudes in the old Confederacy have utterly changed. But more important, the speed with which southern statehouses acted invokes a second legacy from the Revolutionary era. Article I, Section 4, of the Constitution, empowers state legislatures to regulate the \u201cTimes, Places and Manner\u201d of conducting elections. That power is, however, subject to congressional review and alteration, and Congress can unilaterally set election rules for every state.<\/p>\n<p>We know from Madison\u2019s notes of debates that the Framers were hardly eager to enhance the authority of the state legislatures. When they first discussed the Elections Clause on August 9, 1787, two South Carolina delegates, John Rutledge and Charles Pinckney, argued that state legislatures needed no congressional supervision at all. It is not surprising that this objection came from the Palmetto State. Its legislature was controlled by a wealthy planter elite whose unitary interest was maintaining the system of chattel slavery that provided their wealth. The malapportionment of seats was one part of this strategy. As the historian Manisha Sinha has noted, district lines in revolutionary South Carolina were \u201cincredibly lopsided, as the small lowcountry parishes were accorded the same representative weight as the much larger and more populous interior election districts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Madison rebutted the South Carolinians, and two of his points merit attention. He understood, first, that creating a popularly elected national legislature was necessarily experimental. Should delegations be elected statewide, with citizens voting for a whole slate, or in individual districts? Should citizens vote \u201cby ballot or viva voc\u00ea\u201d? With so many matters to resolve, Madison warned, \u201cIt was impossible to foresee all the abuses that might be made of the discretionary power.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But how and why would these \u201cabuses\u201d occur? Although Madison never mentioned South Carolina by name, he likely regarded that state as a worst-case example. \u201cWhenever the State Legislatures had a favorite measure to carry,\u201d Madison continued, \u201cthey would take care so to mould their regulations as to favor the candidates they wished to succeed. Besides, the inequality of the Representation in the Legislatures of particular States would produce a like inequality in their representation in the National Legislature, as it was presumable that the Counties having the power in the former case would secure it to themselves in the latter.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In this 250<sup>th<\/sup> year of American independence, one cannot imagine a more prescient analysis of the current situation. If state legislatures have unchecked discretion to design congressional districts, as the majority in <em>Callais <\/em>avows, and apply it with complete disdain for the mirroring principle, they will violate the fundamental principle of representation to which the Founding generation was committed.<\/p>\n<p>Madison\u2019s analysis is on point for another reason. It is Congress, not the judiciary, which the Election Clause designates as the institution responsible for supervising the system. Judgments about representation are inherently political, and Congress reasons politically. The three Reconstruction amendments that the Roberts Court is bent on gutting resulted from intensely political deliberations that the nine robed justices could never replicate. The same can be said of the compromises that led to the passage and periodic revision of the Voting Rights Act. The only political factor that matters in <em>Callais<\/em> is the majority\u2019s willful determination to overturn the VRA.<\/p>\n<p>What, then, are we commemorating during the semiquincentennial? Most scholars agree that our republic had two founding moments: one tied to the revolutionary era, which culminated in the adoption of the Constitution; the other shaped by the Civil War and Reconstruction, which tragically ended with the enshrinement of Jim Crow in the 1890s. It will be a perverse celebration indeed if the Supreme Court\u2019s nullification of the Thirteenth Amendment and the Voting Rights Act is the legacy of 2026. That the venerable African American congressman, James Clyburn, the South Carolina Democrat who did so much to promote Joe Biden\u2019s presidential nomination in 2020, seems to have barely escaped a forced March redrawing of district lines provides another reminder of how the effects of <em>Callais <\/em>embody the ethos of the Confederacy and not the Second Founding.<\/p>\n<p>That modest success, however, does not outweigh the greater harm the Supreme Court majority just inflicted in <em>Allen v. Milligan<\/em>. In a critical passage in its brief, unsigned opinion, the majority held that \u201cWhile federal courts should not impose changes close to an election, States are free to decide for themselves whether last-minute changes to an election are in their best interests.\u201d But whose \u201cbest interests\u201d are being served here: the legitimate concerns of voters, many of whom will be confused by last-minute changes, or the partisan designs of a state legislature implementing its own white-supremacist agenda? The three-judge panel, whose ruling the Court overturned, included two jurists nominated by President Donald Trump, unequivocally concluded that racial discrimination was the transparent motive driving the elimination of Alabama\u2019s second African-American district. And from the vantage point of 1787 and 1870, the responsibility for representing the collective interests of the individual states had nothing to do with the House of Representatives. That was the duty of the Senate.This is the brave new political world we welcome on the 250<sup>th<\/sup> anniversary of American independence. It is a world that John C. Calhoun, the avowed defender of slavery \u201cas a positive good\u201d and the leading theorist of nullification, would happily cherish.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=159\">The Washington Monthly Announces Finalists for 2026 Kukula Award Book Review Prize<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Louisiana v. Callais and now Allen v. Milligan have laid bare the court\u2019s fundamental misinterpretation of the Voting Rights Act.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":164,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,17,18,19,2],"tags":[63],"class_list":["post-165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-books","category-government","category-law-and-justice","category-newsletter","category-politics","tag-tagged-callais-constitution-george-w-bush-james-madison-john-c-calhoun-john-roberts-louisiana-v-callais-samuel-alito-supreme-court-voting-righ"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Roberts Court\u2019s Gutting of the Voting Rights Act Nears Completion - USA Business Chronicle<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Roberts Court\u2019s Gutting of the Voting Rights Act Nears Completion - USA Business Chronicle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Louisiana v. Callais and now Allen v. Milligan have laid bare the court\u2019s fundamental misinterpretation of the Voting Rights Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"USA Business Chronicle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-10T09:12:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366\"},\"headline\":\"The Roberts Court\u2019s Gutting of the Voting Rights Act Nears Completion\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-10T09:12:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165\"},\"wordCount\":1802,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/dd7ed0995489fa6d1b695c335e7d6917.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Tagged: Callais,\u00a0Constitution,\u00a0George W. Bush,\u00a0James Madison,\u00a0John C. Calhoun,\u00a0John Roberts,\u00a0Louisiana v. Callais,\u00a0Samuel Alito,\u00a0Supreme Court,\u00a0Voting Rights Act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Books\",\"Government\",\"Law and Justice\",\"Newsletter\",\"Politics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165\",\"name\":\"The Roberts Court\u2019s Gutting of the Voting Rights Act Nears Completion - USA Business Chronicle\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/dd7ed0995489fa6d1b695c335e7d6917.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-10T09:12:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/dd7ed0995489fa6d1b695c335e7d6917.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/dd7ed0995489fa6d1b695c335e7d6917.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1706},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?p=165#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Roberts Court\u2019s Gutting of the Voting Rights Act Nears Completion\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"USA Business Chronicle\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/usabusinesschronicle.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Roberts Court\u2019s Gutting of the Voting Rights Act Nears Completion - USA Business Chronicle","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Roberts Court\u2019s Gutting of the Voting Rights Act Nears Completion - USA Business Chronicle","og_description":"Louisiana v. Callais and now Allen v. Milligan have laid bare the court\u2019s fundamental misinterpretation of the Voting Rights Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165","og_site_name":"USA Business Chronicle","article_published_time":"2026-06-10T09:12:00+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366"},"headline":"The Roberts Court\u2019s Gutting of the Voting Rights Act Nears Completion","datePublished":"2026-06-10T09:12:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165"},"wordCount":1802,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/dd7ed0995489fa6d1b695c335e7d6917.webp","keywords":["Tagged: Callais,\u00a0Constitution,\u00a0George W. Bush,\u00a0James Madison,\u00a0John C. Calhoun,\u00a0John Roberts,\u00a0Louisiana v. Callais,\u00a0Samuel Alito,\u00a0Supreme Court,\u00a0Voting Rights Act"],"articleSection":["Books","Government","Law and Justice","Newsletter","Politics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165","url":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165","name":"The Roberts Court\u2019s Gutting of the Voting Rights Act Nears Completion - USA Business Chronicle","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/dd7ed0995489fa6d1b695c335e7d6917.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-10T09:12:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/dd7ed0995489fa6d1b695c335e7d6917.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/dd7ed0995489fa6d1b695c335e7d6917.webp","width":2560,"height":1706},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?p=165#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Roberts Court\u2019s Gutting of the Voting Rights Act Nears Completion"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/","name":"USA Business Chronicle","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b63e0267c8881fa22972f2a01b50d366","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com"],"url":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/165\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/164"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usabusinesschronicle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}